Smith v. Hooker Chemical & Plastics Corp.
511 N.E.2d 81, 69 N.Y.2d 1029, 517 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 16823
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal granted. Cross motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that plaintiff, having stipulated to reducing the amount of damages to which he is entitled, is not aggrieved by the modification for purposes of appeal (see, CPLR 5511; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 96, at 408-409, and n 62; Dudley v Perkins, 235 NY 448, 457).
Judge Simons taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Hooker Chemical & Plastics Corp., 511 N.E.2d 81, 69 N.Y.2d 1029, 517 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 16823 (N.Y. 1987).
511 N.E.2d 81 (Smith v. Hooker Chemical & Plastics Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dumond v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
2018 NY Slip Op 7853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Northern Leasing Sys., Inc. v. Kollars
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
Barber v. Helwig
277 A.D.2d 995 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Raji v. Bank Sepah-Iran
549 N.E.2d 146 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
Goodman v. Goodman
150 A.D.2d 636 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Hedgepeth v. Merz
533 N.E.2d 671 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
Pozzanghera v. Anderson
136 A.D.2d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
McDougald v. Garber
135 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)