Raji v. Bank Sepah-Iran
549 N.E.2d 146, 74 N.Y.2d 916, 549 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 3285
Opinion
Motion to dismiss appeal granted and appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. On the court’s own motion, cross appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that plaintiffs, having stipulated to reducing the amount of [917]*917damages to which they are entitled, are not aggrieved by the modification for purposes of appeal (see, CPLR 5511; Smith v Hooker Chem. & Plastics Corp., 69 NY2d 1029; Dudley v Perkins, 235 NY 448).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raji v. Bank Sepah-Iran, 549 N.E.2d 146, 74 N.Y.2d 916, 549 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 3285 (N.Y. 1989).
549 N.E.2d 146 (Raji v. Bank Sepah-Iran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Northern Leasing Sys., Inc. v. Kollars
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
Oropallo v. Tecler
263 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In re Elmer Q.
250 A.D.2d 256 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)