Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections

963 So. 2d 824, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12150, 2007 WL 2212611
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 546
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 3, 2007·No. No. 1D06-0745·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We AFFIRM the dismissal of appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus. Of the ancillary issues raised by appellant, only one merits discussion. As appellant contends and appellee concedes, the trial court erred in imposing a lien on appellant’s inmate trust account to recoup court costs and fees incurred with respect to the mandamus proceedings. See Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So.2d 361 (Fla.2003); Wagner v. McDonough, 927 So.2d 216 (Fla. 1st [825]*825DCA 2006); Cason v. Crosby, 892 So.2d 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Accordingly, the order imposing the hen is REVERSED.

We likewise grant appellant’s motion for review of the trial court’s order of insolvency for purposes of appeal to the extent that we vacate the portion of that order imposing a lien for appellate costs and fees. On remand, the trial court shall direct the reimbursement of any funds collected pursuant to the improper liens.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

BARFIELD, and ROBERTS, JJ., and LAWRENCE, JR., L. ARTHUR, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections, 963 So. 2d 824, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12150, 2007 WL 2212611 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

963 So. 2d 824 (Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cason v. Crosby
892 So. 2d 536 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Schmidt v. Crusoe
878 So. 2d 361 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Wagner v. McDonough
927 So. 2d 216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)