Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections

911 So. 2d 836, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13868, 2005 WL 2105776
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections. Read the opinion of the Court — 882 So. 2d 1090
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 2, 2005·No. No. 1D04-3249·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the order by which the circuit court denied his claims for a declaratory judgment and mandamus relief. We conclude that the circuit court properly denied declaratory relief, and the appellant has failed to demonstrate an entitlement to relief on second-tier review of disciplinary proceedings against the appellant for disobeying a verbal order. But the appellant is entitled to mandamus relief compelling the appellee to follow its own rules requiring that the warden personally make the decision to approve, return, or deny grievances of reprisal and grievances involving disciplinary action filed directly with the warden. See Fla. Admin. Code R. 33-103.002(15)(e), 33-103.006(3), & 33-103.015(3); Rivera v. Moore, 825 So.2d 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Accordingly, that portion of the order by which the circuit court denied the appellant’s claim for relief pursuant to the above-described rules is reversed, but the order is otherwise affirmed.

ALLEN, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections, 911 So. 2d 836, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13868, 2005 WL 2105776 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

911 So. 2d 836 (Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rivera v. Moore
825 So. 2d 505 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)