Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections

953 So. 2d 689, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4861, 2007 WL 980714

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 4, 2007

DocketNo. 1D06-2475

StatusPublished

This text of 953 So. 2d 689 (Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections, 953 So. 2d 689, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4861, 2007 WL 980714 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION TO CORRECT OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s Motion to Correct Opinion is granted and this court’s opinion dated February 28, 2007, is hereby withdrawn and substituted with the following:

Appellant, Glenn Smith, raises several challenges on appeal, only one of which has merit. As the State concedes, the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for relief from an order assessing appellate processing fees and costs against appellant for a previous appeal taken by another inmate. We, therefore, reverse and remand to the trial court to grant the appropriate relief to appellant for the improperly assessed fees.

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION TO CORRECT OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s Motion to Correct Opinion is granted and this court’s opinion dated February 28, 2007, is hereby withdrawn and substituted with the following:

Appellant, Glenn Smith, raises several challenges on appeal, only one of which has merit. As the State concedes, the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for relief from an order assessing appellate processing fees and costs against appellant for a previous appeal taken by another inmate. We, therefore, reverse and remand to the trial court to grant the appropriate relief to appellant for the improperly assessed fees.

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

953 So. 2d 689, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4861, 2007 WL 980714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-florida-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2007.