Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections

826 So. 2d 477, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13463, 2002 WL 31093958

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 20, 2002

DocketNo. 1D01-3541

StatusPublished

This text of 826 So. 2d 477 (Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections, 826 So. 2d 477, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13463, 2002 WL 31093958 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Glenn Smith appeals the circuit court’s order dismissing his complaint for declaratory judgment. The circuit court dismissed the complaint based on its finding that Smith had not exhausted his administrative remedies. This issue was litigated in a prior appeal, and this court held in favor of Smith. See Smith v. Florida Dep’t of Corrections, 763 So.2d 1264 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); see also Smith v. Florida Dep’t of Corrections, 797 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Under the law of the case doctrine, we reverse the decision of the circuit court and remand for further proceedings.

ERVIN, WOLF and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Glenn Smith appeals the circuit court’s order dismissing his complaint for declaratory judgment. The circuit court dismissed the complaint based on its finding that Smith had not exhausted his administrative remedies. This issue was litigated in a prior appeal, and this court held in favor of Smith. See Smith v. Florida Dep’t of Corrections, 763 So.2d 1264 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); see also Smith v. Florida Dep’t of Corrections, 797 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Under the law of the case doctrine, we reverse the decision of the circuit court and remand for further proceedings.

ERVIN, WOLF and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

826 So. 2d 477, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13463, 2002 WL 31093958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-florida-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack