Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections

802 So. 2d 1175, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17829, 2001 WL 1616566
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15132
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 2001·No. No. 1D00-4517·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner seeks certiorari review of an order dismissing his complaint for declaratory relief and mandamus. We agree with the trial court that the petitioner failed to allege an entitlement to declaratory relief, and, with one exception, we agree that the mandamus claims were properly dismissed. The complaint is sufficient to state a claim that the Department of Corrections failed to investigate the April 7, 2000 infraction by interviewing witnesses identified by the inmate. See Fla. Admin. Code 33-601 .305 (2000). Because the complaint was dismissed without a response, the record does not refute this claim. Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari and remand the case for the purpose of addressing this issue. We deny the petition as to the remaining issues raised in the complaint for declaratory relief and mandamus.

BOOTH, WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections, 802 So. 2d 1175, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17829, 2001 WL 1616566 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

802 So. 2d 1175 (Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.