Smith v. District of Columbia

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedApril 6, 2017
DocketCivil Action No. 2015-0161
StatusPublished

This text of Smith v. District of Columbia (Smith v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. District of Columbia, (D.D.C. 2017).

Opinion

81,7(' 67$7(6 ',675,&7 &2857 )25 7+( ',675,&7 2) &2/80%,$ BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

*5(*25< 60,7+

3ODLQWLII

Y &LYLO $FWLRQ 1R  $%-

',675,&7 2) &2/80%,$ et al.

'HIHQGDQWV BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

0(025$1'80 23,1,21 $1' 25'(5

3ODLQWLII *UHJRU\ 6PLWK EURXJKW WKLV FLYLO ULJKWV DFWLRQ XQGHU WR  86& †  DOOHJLQJ

WKDW WKH 'LVWULFW RI &ROXPELD 'HSDUWPHQW RI &RUUHFWLRQV ³'2&´ XQODZIXOO\ GHWDLQHG KLP IRU

WZHQW\WKUHH GD\V DIWHU D FRXUW RUGHUHG WKDW KH ZDV WR EH UHOHDVHG IURP FXVWRG\ $PHQG &RPSO

>'NW  @ DW  ,Q FRQQHFWLRQ ZLWK D GLVFRYHU\ GLVSXWH SODLQWLII ILOHG D 0RWLRQ IRU &RVWV DQG )HHV

DJDLQVW WKH 'LVWULFW DUJXLQJ WKDW GHIHQGDQW YLRODWHG )HGHUDO 5XOHV RI &LYLO 3URFHGXUH  D  

 H   F   DQG  G  DQG VHHNLQJ ³WR UHFRYHU FRVWV DQG IHHV LQFXUUHG DV D UHVXOW RI D

PLVUHSUHVHQWDWLRQ E\ >GHIHQGDQW@ DERXW WKH H[LVWHQFH RI GRFXPHQWV GXULQJ WKH FRXUVH RI

GLVFRYHU\´ 3O¶V 0RW IRU &RVWV )HHV >'NW  @ ³3O¶V 0RW´  3O¶V 6WDWHPHQW RI 3 $ LQ

6XSS RI 3O¶V 0RW >'NW  @ ³3O¶V 6WDWHPHQW´ DW  'HIHQGDQW GHQLHG YLRODWLQJ DQ\

GLVFRYHU\ UXOHV DQG DUJXHG WKDW DQ\ FRVWV DQG IHHV LQFXUUHG E\ SODLQWLII ³DUH WKH QRUPDO FRVWV RI

OLWLJDWLRQ RQO\ WR EH UHLPEXUVHG VKRXOG >S@ODLQWLII SUHYDLO DW WKH HQG RI WKH FDVH    ´ 'HI 'LVWULFW

RI &ROXPELD¶V 0HP RI 3 $ LQ 2SS WR 3O¶V 0RW >'NW  @ ³'HI¶V 2SS´ DW 

7KH &RXUW UHIHUUHG WKH PRWLRQ WR D 0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH IRU D GHFLVLRQ SXUVXDQW WR /RFDO &LYLO

5XOH  0LQ 2UGHU 5HIHUULQJ &DVH -XQH    2Q 'HFHPEHU   WKH 0DJLVWUDWH

-XGJH LVVXHG DQ RUGHU JUDQWLQJ WKH PRWLRQ LQ SDUW DQG GHQ\LQJ LW LQ SDUW 2UGHU >'NW  @ 7KH 0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH IRXQG WKDW GHIHQGDQW KDG FRPPLWWHG WZR GLVFRYHU\ YLRODWLRQV DQG DZDUGHG

SODLQWLII DWWRUQH\V¶ IHHV LQ WKH DPRXQW RI   IRU  KRXUV RI 0U .ODSURWK¶V

WLPH DW  SHU KRXU DQG  IRU  KRXUV RI 0U $NXOLDQ¶V WLPH DW  SHU KRXU 0HP

2S UH 3O¶V 0RW >'NW  @ ³0HP 2S´ DW 

7KH RQO\ REMHFWLRQ UDLVHG WR WKH 0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH¶V UXOLQJ UHODWHV WR WKH DPRXQW RI

DWWRUQH\V¶ IHHV ± LQ SDUWLFXODU WKH KRXUO\ UDWH XVHG WR FDOFXODWH WKH IHHV 'HI¶V 2EM WR 0DJLVWUDWH

-XGJH¶V 'HF   5XOLQJ >'NW  @ ³'HI¶V 2EM´  0HP RI 3 $ LQ 6XSS RI 'HI¶V 2EM

>'NW  @ ³'HI¶V 2EM 0HP´  'HIHQGDQW DUJXHV WKDW WKH 0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH FRPPLWWHG FOHDU

HUURU ZKHQ VKH DSSOLHG WKH KLJKHU /HJDO 6HUYLFHV ,QGH[ ³/6,´ Laffey UDWHV UDWKHU WKDQ WKH 8QLWHG

6WDWHV $WWRUQH\¶V 2IILFH ³86$2´ Laffey UDWHV 'HI¶V 2EM 0HP DW ± 3ODLQWLII FRQWHQGV WKDW

WKH XVH RI WKH KLJKHU UDWH VFDOH ZDV MXVWLILHG EHFDXVH WKH FDVH LQYROYHV FRPSOH[ IHGHUDO OLWLJDWLRQ

3O¶V 5HVS WR 'HI¶V 2EM >'NW  @ ³3O¶V 5HVS´ DW ± 'HIHQGDQW¶V REMHFWLRQV WR WKH

0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH¶V UXOLQJ DUH QRZ EHIRUH WKH &RXUW

7KH &RXUW FRQFOXGHV WKDW WKH 0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH FRPPLWWHG FOHDU HUURU LQ FDOFXODWLQJ WKH

IHHV DQG WKHUHIRUH LW ZLOO RUGHU GHIHQGDQW WR SD\ SODLQWLII DWWRUQH\V¶ IHHV FRUUHVSRQGLQJ WR WKH UDWHV

VHW IRUWK LQ WKH 86$2 Laffey 0DWUL[ IRU D WRWDO SD\PHQW RI  :KLOH WKH '& &LUFXLW

KDV DXWKRUL]HG WKH XVH RI WKH KLJKHU PDWUL[ LQ FRPSOH[ IHGHUDO OLWLJDWLRQ LQ JHQHUDO SODLQWLII KDV

IDLOHG WR PHHW KLV EXUGHQ WR HVWDEOLVK WKDW WKH UDWHV DUH UHDVRQDEOH LQ WKLV FDVH LQ SDUWLFXODU DQG

WKHUHIRUH WKH 0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH¶V GHWHUPLQDWLRQ ZDV FRQWUDU\ WR ODZ

%$&.*528'

³7KH Laffey 0DWUL[ VHWV RXW D JHQHUDO JXLGHOLQH IRU DZDUGLQJ DWWRUQH\V¶ IHHV EDVHG RQ

H[SHULHQFH´ Salazar ex. rel. Salazar v. District of Columbia  )G   '& &LU  

%XW WKH UDWHV DUH WKLUW\ \HDUV ROG DQG PXVW EH DGMXVWHG IRU LQIODWLRQ Id. $V D UHVXOW XSGDWHG Laffey

 PDWULFHV KDYH EHHQ GHYHORSHG LQFOXGLQJ WKH WZR DW LVVXH KHUH  WKH ³/6, Laffey 0DWUL[´

XSGDWHG LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK WKH /HJDO 6HUYLFHV ,QGH[ RI WKH 1DWLRQZLGH &RQVXPHU 3ULFH ,QGH[

DQG  WKH ³86$2 Laffey 0DWUL[´ ZKLFK LV PDLQWDLQHG E\ WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV $WWRUQH\¶V 2IILFH

DQG DGMXVWV UDWHV WR DFFRXQW IRU LQIODWLRQ E\ XVLQJ WKH $OO,WHPV &RQVXPHU 3ULFH ,QGH[ IRU WKH

:DVKLQJWRQ '& DUHD See id. Eley v. District of Columbia  )G  ± '& &LU

 HODERUDWLQJ RQ WKH GLIIHUHQFHV EHWZHHQ WKH WZR PDWULFHV 

3ODLQWLII VRXJKW DWWRUQH\V¶ IHHV FDOFXODWHG DW WKH UDWHV VHW RXW LQ WKH /6, Laffey 0DWUL[

SRLQWLQJ RXW WKDW WKH XVH RI WKH UDWHV ZDV DIILUPHG UHFHQWO\ E\ WKH '& &LUFXLW LQ Salazar  )G

DW  D FDVH LQYROYLQJ IHGHUDO FLYLO ULJKWV OLWLJDWLRQ 5HSO\ %U LQ 6XSS RI 3O¶V 0RW >'NW  @

³3O¶V 5HSO\´ DW ± 'HIHQGDQW DUJXHG WKDW SODLQWLII¶V UHTXHVWHG UDWHV ZHUH ³H[FHVVLYH

XQUHDVRQDEOH DQG ZRXOG FRQVWLWXWH D ZLQGIDOO IRU >S@ODLQWLII¶V FRXQVHO´ DQG WKDW WKH 0DJLVWUDWH

-XGJH VKRXOG FDOFXODWH WKH UDWHV EDVHG RQ WKH 86$2 Laffey 0DWUL[ 'HI¶V 2SS DW ±

,Q KHU UXOLQJ WKH 0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH VWDWHG DW WKH RXWVHW WKDW WKH ³GLVWULFW FRXUW KDV EURDG

GLVFUHWLRQ LQ GHWHUPLQLQJ WKH VL]H RI DQ H[SHQVH DZDUG XQGHU 5XOH ´ 0HP 2S DW  TXRWLQJ

Beck v. Test Masters Educ. Servs., Inc.  )5'   ''&   DQG WKDW ³WKH >F@RXUW

XVHV WKH ORGHVWDU PHWKRG PXOWLSO\LQJ D UHDVRQDEO\ KRXUO\ UDWH E\ WKH QXPEHU RI KRXUV H[SHQGHG´

WR GHWHUPLQH WKH VL]H RI WKH DZDUG Id. ,Q UHOLDQFH XSRQ WKH KROGLQJ LQ Salazar WKDW ³DQ DZDUG RI

WKH /6,Laffey UDWHV LQ D FLYLO ULJKWV DFWLRQ ZDV QRW DQ DEXVH RI WKH >G@LVWULFW >F@RXUW¶V GLVFUHWLRQ´

id. DW  FLWLQJ Salazar  )G DW  WKH 0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH IRXQG WKDW SODLQWLII KDG SUHVHQWHG

HQRXJK HYLGHQFH WR HVWDEOLVK WKDW WKH ³/6,Laffey UDWHV DUH WKH SUHYDLOLQJ UDWHV IRU WKLV W\SH RI

FRPSOH[ IHGHUDO OLWLJDWLRQ´ Id. 7KH 0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH DOVR FRQFOXGHG WKDW GHIHQGDQW ³IDLO>HG@ WR

SUHVHQW VXIILFLHQW HYLGHQFH WR UHEXW WKH UHDVRQDEOHQHVV RI WKH /6,Laffey UDWHV UHTXHVWHG E\

>S@ODLQWLII´ Id.

 'HIHQGDQW KDG VXEPLWWHG WKH 6WDWHPHQW RI ,QWHUHVW RI WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV ZKLFK WKH 'LVWULFW

KDG SUHYLRXVO\ VXEPLWWHG WR WKH GLVWULFW FRXUW LQ Eley v. District of Columbia  ) 6XSS G 

''&   DQG ZKLFK DUJXHV WKDW 86$2 Laffey UDWHV VKRXOG EH WKH KLJKHVW UDWHV DZDUGHG IRU

DWWRUQH\ IHHV See 0HP 2S DW  ([  WR 'HI¶V 2SS >'NW  @ %XW WKH 0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH

VWDWHG WKDW VKH ZRXOG DFFRUG WKH 6WDWHPHQW RI ,QWHUHVW IURP Eley ³UHODWLYHO\ OLWWOH ZHLJKW´ EHFDXVH

LW ³SUHGDWHV Salazar´ DQG ³GHDOV PDLQO\ ZLWK UDWHV IRU IHHV VXEMHFW WR D IHHVKLIWLQJ VWDWXWH UDWKHU

WKDQ 5XOH  VDQFWLRQV    ´ 0HP 2S DW  :LWKRXW RWKHU HYLGHQFH WR UHEXW D ILQGLQJ WKDW WKH

/6, Laffey UDWHV ZHUH UHDVRQDEOH WKH 0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH H[HUFLVHG KHU GLVFUHWLRQ ³WR DZDUG

>S@ODLQWLII DWWRUQH\V¶ IHHV FRUUHVSRQGLQJ WR WKH KRXUO\ UDWH VHW IRUWK LQ WKH /6,Laffey PDWUL[´ Id.

'HIHQGDQW KDV REMHFWHG WR WKH 0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH¶V GHFLVLRQ WR DSSO\ WKH KRXUO\ UDWHV

FRQWDLQHG LQ WKH /6, Laffey 0DWUL[ LQVWHDG RI WKH OHVV JHQHURXV 86$2 Laffey IHH VFKHGXOH 'HI¶V

2EM DW  ,W FRQWHQGV WKDW SODLQWLII GLG QRW SURGXFH VXIILFLHQW HYLGHQFH WR HVWDEOLVK WKDW WKH KRXUO\

UDWHV ZHUH UHDVRQDEOH DQG WKDW WKH 0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH HUUHG LQ DSSO\LQJ WKH /6, Laffey UDWH VFKHGXOH

'HI¶V 2EM 0HP DW ± 7KH &RXUW DJUHHV $IWHU UHYLHZLQJ WKH 0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH¶V GHFLVLRQ

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Smith v. District of Columbia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-district-of-columbia-dcd-2017.