Smith v. City of New York

2022 NY Slip Op 00830
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 8, 2022
DocketIndex No. 26623/20E Appeal No. 15269 Case No. 2021-02797
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2022 NY Slip Op 00830 (Smith v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. City of New York, 2022 NY Slip Op 00830 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Smith v City of New York (2022 NY Slip Op 00830)
Smith v City of New York
2022 NY Slip Op 00830
Decided on February 08, 2022
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: February 08, 2022
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Oing, González, Shulman, Higgitt, JJ.

Index No. 26623/20E Appeal No. 15269 Case No. 2021-02797

[*1]Ana J. Smith, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

The City of New York et al., Defendants, Esther Zarembski, Defendant-Appellant.


Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Kutner, LLP, Melville (Megan R. Pollastro of counsel), for appellant.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mitchell J. Danziger, J.), entered April 6, 2021, which denied defendant Esther Zarembski's motion to preclude plaintiff from offering evidence at trial with respect to any of the particulars set forth in defendant's demand for a verified bill of particulars, or, in the alternative, to compel plaintiff to provide a bill of particulars by a date certain, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In response to defendant's demand, plaintiff furnished a bill of particulars that contained an adequate description of the date and approximate time of the alleged occurrence, the location of the accident, the acts or omissions of defendant constituting negligence, and the manner in which defendant obtained notice of the dangerous

condition (see CPLR 3043[a][1]-[5], [c]; see e.g. Harris v Ariel Transp. Corp., 37 AD3d 308 [1st Dept 2007]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: February 8, 2022



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. City of New York
2022 NY Slip Op 00830 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2022 NY Slip Op 00830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2022.