Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Smith v. Bloodworth

Smith v. Bloodworth

170 S.E.2d 429, 225 Ga. 608, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 584
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 29, 1969·No. 25420·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Frankum, Justice.

This appeal was docketed in this court on August, 5, 1969. The appellant’s enumeration of errors was not filed until August 19,. 1969. Rule 20 of. this court requires that the brief of the appellant must be filed with the clerk within ten days after the docketing of the case. Rule 14 of this court provides: “Failure to file enumeration of errors *609 within the time specified in these rules for the filing of briefs may be deemed as failure to perfect the appeal.” The appellant having failed to perfect the appeal and no providential cause having been shown for such failure, it is ordered that the appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed.

Submitted September 9, 1969 Decided September 29, 1969. Mullís & Nichols, Gerald S. Mullís, S. Phillip Brown, for appellant. Jack J. Gautier, District Attorney, Whitney T. Evans, Jr., for appellee.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Bloodworth, 170 S.E.2d 429, 225 Ga. 608, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 584 (Ga. 1969).

170 S.E.2d 429 (Smith v. Bloodworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seigler v. Smith
185 S.E.2d 377 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Watson v. Stynchcombe
184 S.E.2d 580 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Tucker v. Mir-A-Mar, Inc.
184 S.E.2d 362 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Kenney v. State
183 S.E.2d 384 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Ackerman v. Thornburgh
183 S.E.2d 466 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Owens v. Smith
181 S.E.2d 858 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Orr v. Smith
176 S.E.2d 92 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1970)