Seigler v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Seigler v. Smith

185 S.E.2d 377, 228 Ga. 270, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 537

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 21, 1971

Docket26803

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 185 S.E.2d 377 (Seigler v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seigler v. Smith, 185 S.E.2d 377, 228 Ga. 270, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 537 (Ga. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Hawes, Justice.

The appeal in this case was docketed in this court on August 25, 1971. The appellant’s enumeration of errors was not filed within 20 days from that date. Rule 14 (a) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, effective July 1, 1971 (226 Ga. 905, 911) requires that the enumeration of errors of the appellant shall be filed with the clerk of this court within 20 days after the case is docketed in his office and that failure to file the enumeration of errors within the time specified may be deemed as a failure to complete the appeal. See Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 29; Code Ann. § 6-810. The appellant having failed to perfect the appeal and no providential cause having been shown for such failure, it is ordered that the appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed. See Smith v. Bloodworth, 225 Ga. 608 (170 SE2d 429).

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawes, Justice.

The appeal in this case was docketed in this court on August 25, 1971. The appellant’s enumeration of errors was not filed within 20 days from that date. Rule 14 (a) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, effective July 1, 1971 (226 Ga. 905, 911) requires that the enumeration of errors of the appellant shall be filed with the clerk of this court within 20 days after the case is docketed in his office and that failure to file the enumeration of errors within the time specified may be deemed as a failure to complete the appeal. See Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 29; Code Ann. § 6-810. The appellant having failed to perfect the appeal and no providential cause having been shown for such failure, it is ordered that the appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed. See Smith v. Bloodworth, 225 Ga. 608 (170 SE2d 429).

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 S.E.2d 377, 228 Ga. 270, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seigler-v-smith-ga-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack