Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Tucker v. Mir-A-Mar, Inc.

Tucker v. Mir-A-Mar, Inc.

184 S.E.2d 362, 124 Ga. App. 452, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 961
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 17, 1971
Docket46554
StatusPublished

This text of 184 S.E.2d 362 (Tucker v. Mir-A-Mar, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tucker v. Mir-A-Mar, Inc., 184 S.E.2d 362, 124 Ga. App. 452, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 961 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

Pannell, Judge.

The record in this case discloses that the enumeration of errors was not filed within 20 days from the filing of the record with the clerk of this court which is required by the rules of this court (Rule 8; Rule 14 (a)), effective July 1, 1971, as to all cases docketed in this court on or after that date; and no proper cause being shown for such failure, the appeal is hereby dismissed. Smith v. Bloodworth, 225 Ga. 608 (170 SE2d 429); Carson v. Carson, 225 Ga. 59 (165 SE2d 846).

Appeal dismissed.

Bell, C. J., and Deen, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carson v. Carson
165 S.E.2d 846 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)
Smith v. Bloodworth
170 S.E.2d 429 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 S.E.2d 362, 124 Ga. App. 452, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-mir-a-mar-inc-gactapp-1971.