Smith v. Barclay

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Smith v. Barclay

429 A.2d 438, 286 Pa. Super. 510, 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2618

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 8, 1981

Docket131

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 429 A.2d 438 (Smith v. Barclay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Barclay, 429 A.2d 438, 286 Pa. Super. 510, 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2618 (Pa. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from an order of the court of common pleas transferring appellee Michael Smith’s action in trespass to the Arbitration Panels for Health Care established under the Pennsylvania Health Care Services Malpractice Act (Act). 1 Appellee’s complaint avers negligence on the part of appellant Barclay and Indiana Hospital. The court below found that it lacked jurisdiction over the matter because section 309 of the Act, 40 P.S. § 1301.309, granted the health care arbitration panels “original exclusive jurisdiction” over medical malpractice claims. Accordingly, by order dated January 31, 1980, the court below transferred the case to the Arbitration Panels for Health Care.

*512 In Mattos v. Thompson, 491 Pa. 385, 421 A.2d 190 (1980), our supreme court declared section 309 of the Act unconstitutional “because the delays involved in processing these claims under the prescribed procedures set up under the Act result in an oppressive delay and impermissibly infringes [sic] upon the constitutional right to a jury.” Id., 491 Pa. at 400, 421 A.2d at 196.

In light of the holding in Mattos, the order transferring the instant case to the health care arbitration panels is reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Indiana County for further proceedings.

1

. Act of October 15, 1975, P.L. 390, No. Ill, et seq., as amended by the Act of December 14, 1979, P.L. 562, No. 128, 40 P.S. §§ 1301.101 et seq. (Supp. 1980-81).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from an order of the court of common pleas transferring appellee Michael Smith’s action in trespass to the Arbitration Panels for Health Care established under the Pennsylvania Health Care Services Malpractice Act (Act). 1 Appellee’s complaint avers negligence on the part of appellant Barclay and Indiana Hospital. The court below found that it lacked jurisdiction over the matter because section 309 of the Act, 40 P.S. § 1301.309, granted the health care arbitration panels “original exclusive jurisdiction” over medical malpractice claims. Accordingly, by order dated January 31, 1980, the court below transferred the case to the Arbitration Panels for Health Care.

*512 In Mattos v. Thompson, 491 Pa. 385, 421 A.2d 190 (1980), our supreme court declared section 309 of the Act unconstitutional “because the delays involved in processing these claims under the prescribed procedures set up under the Act result in an oppressive delay and impermissibly infringes [sic] upon the constitutional right to a jury.” Id., 491 Pa. at 400, 421 A.2d at 196.

In light of the holding in Mattos, the order transferring the instant case to the health care arbitration panels is reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Indiana County for further proceedings.

1

. Act of October 15, 1975, P.L. 390, No. Ill, et seq., as amended by the Act of December 14, 1979, P.L. 562, No. 128, 40 P.S. §§ 1301.101 et seq. (Supp. 1980-81).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

429 A.2d 438, 286 Pa. Super. 510, 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-barclay-pasuperct-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack