Grossi v. Presbyterian-University Hospital

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Grossi v. Presbyterian-University Hospital

449 A.2d 705, 303 Pa. Super. 314, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4997

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 13, 1982

DocketAppeal No. 1632

StatusPublished

This text of 449 A.2d 705 (Grossi v. Presbyterian-University Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grossi v. Presbyterian-University Hospital, 449 A.2d 705, 303 Pa. Super. 314, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4997 (Pa. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order in which the court below dismissed the complaint on the ground that exclusive original jurisdiction was in the Arbitration Panels for Health Care. In light of our Supreme Court’s decision in Mattos v. Thompson, 491 Pa. 385, 421 A.2d 190 (1980), the order must be reversed, and the case remanded for trial. . Spruk v. United Laboratories of Cleveland, 290 Pa.Super.Ct. 74, 434 A.2d 136 (1981); Ehritz v. Cappriotti, 288 Pa.Super.Ct. 265, 431 A.2d 1040 (1981); Gallagher v. Caliguiri, 287 Pa.Super.Ct. 250, 429 A.2d 1195 (1981); Smith v. Barclay, 286 [315]*315Pa.Super.Ct. 510, 429 A.2d 438 (1981); see Firich v. American Cystoscope Makers, Inc., 635 A.2d 259, 261 (3rd Cir. 1980).

Order reversed, complaint reinstated, and case remanded for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order in which the court below dismissed the complaint on the ground that exclusive original jurisdiction was in the Arbitration Panels for Health Care. In light of our Supreme Court’s decision in Mattos v. Thompson, 491 Pa. 385, 421 A.2d 190 (1980), the order must be reversed, and the case remanded for trial. . Spruk v. United Laboratories of Cleveland, 290 Pa.Super.Ct. 74, 434 A.2d 136 (1981); Ehritz v. Cappriotti, 288 Pa.Super.Ct. 265, 431 A.2d 1040 (1981); Gallagher v. Caliguiri, 287 Pa.Super.Ct. 250, 429 A.2d 1195 (1981); Smith v. Barclay, 286 [315]*315Pa.Super.Ct. 510, 429 A.2d 438 (1981); see Firich v. American Cystoscope Makers, Inc., 635 A.2d 259, 261 (3rd Cir. 1980).

Order reversed, complaint reinstated, and case remanded for trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

449 A.2d 705, 303 Pa. Super. 314, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grossi-v-presbyterian-university-hospital-pasuperct-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack