Ganzy v. Provan

446 A.2d 329, 300 Pa. Super. 259, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4347
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 4, 1982·No. Appeal Nos. 1385 & 1404·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order in which the lower court transferred the case to the Arbitration Panels for Health Care on the ground that the Arbitration Panels had exclusive original jurisdiction. In light of our Supreme Court’s decision in Mattos v. Thompson, 491 Pa. 385, 421 A.2d 190 (1980), the order must be reversed, and the case remanded for trial. Spruk v. United Laboratories of Cleveland, 290 Pa.Super.Ct. 74, 434 A.2d 136 (1981); Ehritz v. Capriotti, 288 Pa.Super.Ct. 265, 431 A.2d 1040 (1981); Gallagher v. Caliguiri, 287 Pa.Super.Ct. 250, 429 A.2d 1195 (1981); Smith v. Barclay, 286 Pa.Super.Ct. 510, 429 A.2d 438 (1981); see Firich v. American Cystoscope Makers, Inc., 635 F.2d 259, 261 (3rd Cir. 1980).

Order reversed, and case remanded for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ganzy v. Provan, 446 A.2d 329, 300 Pa. Super. 259, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4347 (Pa. Ct. App. 1982).

446 A.2d 329 (Ganzy v. Provan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spruk v. United Laboratories of Cleveland
434 A.2d 136 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Gallagher v. Caliguiri
429 A.2d 1195 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Smith v. Barclay
429 A.2d 438 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Mattos v. Thompson
421 A.2d 190 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Ehritz v. Cappriotti
431 A.2d 1040 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Firich v. American Cystoscope Makers, Inc.
635 F.2d 259 (Third Circuit, 1980)