Ganzy v. Provan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Ganzy v. Provan

446 A.2d 329, 300 Pa. Super. 259, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4347

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 4, 1982

DocketAppeal Nos. 1385 & 1404

StatusPublished

This text of 446 A.2d 329 (Ganzy v. Provan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ganzy v. Provan, 446 A.2d 329, 300 Pa. Super. 259, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4347 (Pa. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order in which the lower court transferred the case to the Arbitration Panels for Health Care on the ground that the Arbitration Panels had exclusive original jurisdiction. In light of our Supreme Court’s decision in Mattos v. Thompson, 491 Pa. 385, 421 A.2d 190 (1980), the order must be reversed, and the case remanded for trial. Spruk v. United Laboratories of Cleveland, 290 Pa.Super.Ct. 74, 434 A.2d 136 (1981); Ehritz v. Capriotti, 288 Pa.Super.Ct. 265, 431 A.2d 1040 (1981); Gallagher v. Caliguiri, 287 Pa.Super.Ct. 250, 429 A.2d 1195 (1981); Smith v. Barclay, 286 Pa.Super.Ct. 510, 429 A.2d 438 (1981); see Firich v. American Cystoscope Makers, Inc., 635 F.2d 259, 261 (3rd Cir. 1980).

Order reversed, and case remanded for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order in which the lower court transferred the case to the Arbitration Panels for Health Care on the ground that the Arbitration Panels had exclusive original jurisdiction. In light of our Supreme Court’s decision in Mattos v. Thompson, 491 Pa. 385, 421 A.2d 190 (1980), the order must be reversed, and the case remanded for trial. Spruk v. United Laboratories of Cleveland, 290 Pa.Super.Ct. 74, 434 A.2d 136 (1981); Ehritz v. Capriotti, 288 Pa.Super.Ct. 265, 431 A.2d 1040 (1981); Gallagher v. Caliguiri, 287 Pa.Super.Ct. 250, 429 A.2d 1195 (1981); Smith v. Barclay, 286 Pa.Super.Ct. 510, 429 A.2d 438 (1981); see Firich v. American Cystoscope Makers, Inc., 635 F.2d 259, 261 (3rd Cir. 1980).

Order reversed, and case remanded for trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

446 A.2d 329, 300 Pa. Super. 259, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ganzy-v-provan-pasuperct-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack