Slusher v. STATE DEPT. OF COMMERCE

354 So. 2d 450, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15152
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 27, 1978
DocketGG-192
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 354 So. 2d 450 (Slusher v. STATE DEPT. OF COMMERCE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Slusher v. STATE DEPT. OF COMMERCE, 354 So. 2d 450, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15152 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

354 So.2d 450 (1978)

Janet O. SLUSHER, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Respondent.

No. GG-192.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 27, 1978.

Janet O. Slusher in pro per.

Alex Littlefield, Jr., Tallahassee, for appellee.

BOYER, Judge.

Petitioner Slusher seeks review of a determination that she is ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits.

*451 Petitioner was employed as a school teacher in Lakeland, Florida. She voluntarily quit her employment to relocate with her husband in Virginia where he had secured employment. She filed a claim for unemployment compensation which was denied on the basis of F.S. 443.06 which provides that a former employee shall be disqualified for benefits if the employee voluntarily left employment "without good cause attributable to his employer".

Petitioner does not deny that she left her employment in order to be with her husband but urges that her decision to do so was for the preservation of her "American home way of life which is the basic foundation of this nation" and further argues that "no reasonable or sane person would abrogate the responsibility of a lawful marriage to satisfy a mere whim or fancy that leaving their place of employment was without good cause attributable to the employer."

We certainly agree with the proposition that it is desirable to preserve marriages and keep families together. However, we must also agree with the statement of the appeals referee wherein he stated:

"Although the claimant's reason for leaving may be considered a good personal reason, it cannot be considered attributable to the employer. Accordingly, it can only be considered that the claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause attributable to her employer."

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari is denied and the determination of denial of unemployment compensation is

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C.J., and MELVIN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Diaz v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
10 So. 3d 695 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Narbona v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
851 So. 2d 226 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Musawa v. Brumley Enterprises, Inc.
698 So. 2d 1375 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Butera v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
663 So. 2d 10 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Harrison v. Best Maintenance & Janitorial Service, Inc.
649 So. 2d 949 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Medina v. Uffner Textile Corp.
624 So. 2d 871 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Garcia v. AT & T COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
575 So. 2d 730 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Dept. of Air Force v. St. Unemployment Appeals
486 So. 2d 632 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Reinold v. Florida Department of Labor & Employment Security
434 So. 2d 14 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Caraker v. Department of Labor & Employment Security
436 So. 2d 192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Martinez v. Pan American Hospital
409 So. 2d 1173 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
354 So. 2d 450, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slusher-v-state-dept-of-commerce-fladistctapp-1978.