Diaz v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

10 So. 3d 695, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6987, 2009 WL 1423420
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Diaz v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3917
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 22, 2009·No. 5D08-3245·Published

Opinion

MONACO, J.

The appellant, Edgar Diaz, appeals the final order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission affirming the decision of an appeals referee that denied him unemployment compensation benefits. While Mr. Diaz had valid personal reasons for quitting his job, section 443.101(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2008), disqualifies workers who leave employment voluntarily “without good cause attributable to his or her employing unit.” See, e.g., Hall v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n., 697 So.2d 541 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Slusher v. State Dep’t. of Commerce, 354 So.2d 450 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). As the referee found after an evidentiary hearing that Mr. Diaz did, in fact, voluntarily leave his employment without good cause attributable to his employer, and as the Unemployment Appeals Commission concluded that there was substantial, competent evidence to support those findings, and as we find no error in the final order of the Commission, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, 10 So. 3d 695, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6987, 2009 WL 1423420 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

10 So. 3d 695 (Diaz v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slusher v. STATE DEPT. OF COMMERCE
354 So. 2d 450 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Hall v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS
697 So. 2d 541 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)