Skillman v. Riley

10 Cal. 300
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 10 Cal. 300 (Skillman v. Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Skillman v. Riley, 10 Cal. 300 (Cal. 1858).

Opinion

Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Terry, C. J., and Baldwin, J., concurring.

The papers embodied in the transcript, purporting to be a statement, are subject to the objection taken in Marlow v. Marsh, (9 Cal., 259.) The draft prepared by the appellant, and the [301]*301amendments proposed by the respondent, and allowed by the Judge who tried the cause, are not incorporated into one document, and in their separate form do not constitute such a statement as we will notice on appeal. This was expressly decided in the case cited, and in People v. Edwards, (9 Cal., 291.) The judgment-roll is, therefore, the only record properly before us, and this does not disclose any error in the action of the Court below.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kling v. Gustason
281 P. 407 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)
Fritsch v. Stampfli
49 P. 559 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
Oliver v. Blair
8 P. 612 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
Kimball v. Semple
31 Cal. 657 (California Supreme Court, 1867)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Cal. 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skillman-v-riley-cal-1858.