Skillman v. Riley

10 Cal. 300
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1858·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Terry, C. J., and Baldwin, J., concurring.

The papers embodied in the transcript, purporting to be a statement, are subject to the objection taken in Marlow v. Marsh, (9 Cal., 259.) The draft prepared by the appellant, and the [301] amendments proposed by the respondent, and allowed by the Judge who tried the cause, are not incorporated into one document, and in their separate form do not constitute such a statement as we will notice on appeal. This was expressly decided in the case cited, and in People v. Edwards, (9 Cal., 291.) The judgment-roll is, therefore, the only record properly before us, and this does not disclose any error in the action of the Court below.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Skillman v. Riley, 10 Cal. 300 (Cal. 1858).

10 Cal. 300 (Skillman v. Riley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kling v. Gustason
281 P. 407 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)
Fritsch v. Stampfli
49 P. 559 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
Oliver v. Blair
8 P. 612 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
Kimball v. Semple
31 Cal. 657 (California Supreme Court, 1867)