Marlow v. Marsh
9 Cal. 259
Opinion
The papers, purporting to be a statement embodied in the transcript, consist of the draft prepared by the appellants, and the amendments proposed by the respondents, as they were originally served. The amendments agreed to by counsel should have been inserted in their proper place in the draft, and a fair copy of the whole made. In their separate form the draft and amendments do not constitute such a statement as we will look into on appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marlow v. Marsh, 9 Cal. 259 (Cal. 1858).
9 Cal. 259 (Marlow v. Marsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kling v. Gustason
281 P. 407 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)
Fritsch v. Stampfli
49 P. 559 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
Kimball v. Semple
31 Cal. 657 (California Supreme Court, 1867)
Baldwin v. Ferre
23 Cal. 461 (California Supreme Court, 1863)
Skillman v. Riley
10 Cal. 300 (California Supreme Court, 1858)