Oliver v. Blair
5 P. 917, 2 Cal. Unrep. 441
Opinion
In this case the defendants, D. B. Blair and Maef arlane, Blair & Co., by stipulation in the lower court, waived their appeal to this court; and thereafter and thereupon satisfaction of the judgments against them was entered. A motion is made to dismiss the appeal of the defendants above named, which is granted.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oliver v. Blair, 5 P. 917, 2 Cal. Unrep. 441 (Cal. 1885).
5 P. 917 (Oliver v. Blair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hart v. Worthington
204 Cal. App. 2d 634 (California Court of Appeal, 1962)
United States Consol. Seeded Raisin Co. v. Chaddock & Co.
173 F. 577 (Ninth Circuit, 1909)
Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. Waymire
92 P. 645 (California Supreme Court, 1907)
Glover v. Swartz
1899 OK 98 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1899)