Skaggs v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Skaggs v. State

995 S.W.2d 524, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 932

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Skaggs v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 116 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 6, 1999·No. No. 74708·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Robert Skaggs appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the [525]*525trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Robert Skaggs appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the [525]*525trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Skaggs v. State, 995 S.W.2d 524, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 932 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

995 S.W.2d 524 (Skaggs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.