Skaggs v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Skaggs v. State

979 S.W.2d 509, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1926, 1998 WL 821992

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Skaggs v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 582 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 27, 1998·No. No. 73951·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Robert L. Skaggs, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis City denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing on two of his claims, and denying a hearing on other issues raised in his amended motion. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Robert L. Skaggs, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis City denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing on two of his claims, and denying a hearing on other issues raised in his amended motion. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Skaggs v. State, 979 S.W.2d 509, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1926, 1998 WL 821992 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

979 S.W.2d 509 (Skaggs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.