Skaggs v. State

81 S.W.3d 663, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1309, 2002 WL 1339114
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Skaggs v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 116
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 18, 2002·No. No. ED 80460·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Howard Skaggs (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends the motion court erred in denying his post-conviction motion in that (1) he involuntarily entered into his Alford plea because of a statement made by his counsel, and (2) the indictment failed to charge an offense.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Skaggs v. State, 81 S.W.3d 663, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1309, 2002 WL 1339114 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

81 S.W.3d 663 (Skaggs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.