Sipco, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co.

Opinion

Case: 21-1039 Document: 58 Page: 1 Filed: 05/03/2022

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SIPCO, LLC, Appellant

v.

EMERSON ELECTRIC CO., Appellee ______________________

2021-1039, 2021-1040 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019- 00545, IPR2019-00547. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JASON E. STACH, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Gar- rett & Dunner, LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by BENJAMIN AARON SAIDMAN; JAMES R. BARNEY, CONSTANTINE GREGORY GRAMENOPOULOS, Wash- ington, DC.

DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMES RICHARD BATCHELDER, JAMES LAWRENCE DAVIS, JR., DANIEL W. RICHARDS, East Palo Alto, CA. Case: 21-1039 Document: 58 Page: 2 Filed: 05/03/2022

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, LOURIE and BRYSON, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 3, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court