Sipco, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co.
This text of Sipco, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co. (Sipco, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
SIPCO, LLC, Appellant
v.
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO., Appellee ______________________
2018-1986 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017- 00001. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
GREGORY J. GONSALVES, Gonsalves Law Firm, Falls Church, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES R. BARNEY, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC.
JAMES LAWRENCE DAVIS, JR., Ropes & Gray LLP, East Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMES RICHARD BATCHELDER; DOUGLAS HALLWARD- DRIEMEIER, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 10, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sipco, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sipco-llc-v-emerson-electric-co-cafc-2019.