Sipco, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sipco, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 980 F.3d 865
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided June 10, 2019·No. 18-1986·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SIPCO, LLC, Appellant

v.

EMERSON ELECTRIC CO., Appellee ______________________

2018-1986 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017- 00001. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

GREGORY J. GONSALVES, Gonsalves Law Firm, Falls Church, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES R. BARNEY, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC.

JAMES LAWRENCE DAVIS, JR., Ropes & Gray LLP, East Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMES RICHARD BATCHELDER; DOUGLAS HALLWARD- DRIEMEIER, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 10, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sipco, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co., (Fed. Cir. 2019).

Sipco, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co. (Sipco, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.