Sinicropi v. Milone

80 A.D.2d 609, 436 N.Y.S.2d 48, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10297
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 17, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 80 A.D.2d 609 (Sinicropi v. Milone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sinicropi v. Milone, 80 A.D.2d 609, 436 N.Y.S.2d 48, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10297 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the Director of Probation of Nassau County, dated June 20, 1978, which, after a hearing, terminated petitioner’s employment with the Nassau County Probation Department. Petition granted to the extent that the determination is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and matter is remitted to the Nassau County Probation Department for a de novo determination by a deputy director or any other duly qualified individual who may be designated (see County Law, § 401). The determination shall be based upon the original hearing record and shall include written findings of fact showing the grounds for the decision (see Matter of Klein v Department of Mental Hygiene of State of N. Y., 15 AD2d 562). In the event the charges are sustained, and if petitioner’s personnel record is to be considered with respect to the determination of punishment, petitioner shall be so notified and shall be given an opportunity to be heard with respect to that record (cf. Matter of Schadt v Sardino, 67 AD2d 821). Because of his personal involvement in the events underlying some of the specifications of misconduct, Director Milone should have disqualified himself from acting with respect to any of the charges (see, e.g., Matter of O’Reilly v Pisani, 79 AD2d 973; Matter of Aiello v Tempera, 65 AD2d 791; cf. Matter of Murchison, 349 US 133; Arnett v Kennedy, 416 US 134, 196-199 [White, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part]). Mellen, P. J., Hopkins, Mangano and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Byrnes v. Mahon
72 A.D.3d 1079 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Prioleau v. Nicoletti
54 A.D.3d 768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
McComb v. Reasoner
29 A.D.3d 795 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Lowy v. Carter
210 A.D.2d 408 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Sinicropi v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board
125 A.D.2d 386 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Town of Fishkill v. Power Authority
123 A.D.2d 860 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Smith v. Board of Education of Kings Park Central School District
107 A.D.2d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Wiggins v. Board of Education
457 N.E.2d 758 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Edgar v. Dowling
96 A.D.2d 510 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
McCaskill v. D'Elia
95 A.D.2d 779 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Sinicropi v. Bennett
92 A.D.2d 309 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Pelaez v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
88 A.D.2d 443 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Devany v. Rice
84 A.D.2d 565 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Horton v. Kammerer
82 A.D.2d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 A.D.2d 609, 436 N.Y.S.2d 48, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sinicropi-v-milone-nyappdiv-1981.