Sindram v. Robelen

458 F. App'x 263
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 19, 2011·No. No. 11-2005·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Sindram appeals the district court’s order enjoining him from filing further civil actions in the district court without receiving pre-filing authorization. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sindram v. Robelen, No. 1:09-cv-01082-GBL-IDD (E.D.Va. Aug. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sindram v. Robelen, 458 F. App'x 263 (4th Cir. 2011).

458 F. App'x 263 (Sindram v. Robelen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.