Sindram v. Robelen

401 F. App'x 799
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 24, 2010·No. No. 10-1928·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Sindram appeals the district court’s order denying as frivolous his motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in No. 10-1374. The denial of in forma pauperis status is immediately appealable. Roberts v. United States Dist. Ct. 339 U.S. 844, 845, 70 S.Ct. 954, 94 L.Ed. 1326 (1950) (per curiam). We have reviewed the record and conclude the appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sindram v. Robelen, No. 1:09-cv-01082-GBL-IDD (E.D.Va. filed July 14, 2010 & entered July 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sindram v. Robelen, 401 F. App'x 799 (4th Cir. 2010).

401 F. App'x 799 (Sindram v. Robelen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related