Sindram v. Robelen

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1374

MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DOUGLAS B. ROBELEN, State Actor,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

PATRICIA H. HARRINGTON,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01082-GBL-IDD)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 30, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Sindram appeals the district court’s orders

striking his “Verified Amended Complaint and Request for

Injunctive Relief” from the docket and denying his motion for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and dismiss the

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Sindram v.

Robelen, No. 1:09-cv-01082-GBL-IDD (E.D. Va. Mar. 24, 2010;

filed May 21, 2010 & entered June 2, 2010). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED