Sims v. Board of Commissioners
39 Ind. 40
Opinions
This cause was once decided, but a rehearing was granted. The cause has been again submitted. After again considering the question involved, we are of opinion that the judgment below should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion granting the rehearing, which is adopted as the opinion in the cause.
The judgment below .is affirmed, with costs.
Busicirk, C. J., having been of counsel, was absent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sims v. Board of Commissioners, 39 Ind. 40 (Ind. 1872).
39 Ind. 40 (Sims v. Board of Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lincoln v. BD. OF COM'RS OF TIPPECANOE CTY.
510 N.E.2d 716 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1987)
Indiana Waste Systems, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners
389 N.E.2d 52 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1979)
Bryant v. Lake County Trust Company
334 N.E.2d 730 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1975)
Christy v. Board of County Com'rs of Porter County
295 N.E.2d 849 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1973)
Board of Commissioners v. Davis
22 L.R.A. 515 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)
Waymire v. Powell
4 N.E. 886 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1886)
Waller v. Wood
101 Ind. 138 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Miller v. Embree
88 Ind. 133 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)
O'Boyle v. Shannon
80 Ind. 159 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Shuttleworth v. Dunlop
34 N.J. Eq. 488 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1881)
Board of Commissioners v. Richardson
54 Ind. 153 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1876)