Simmons v. State

687 So. 2d 1318, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13207, 1996 WL 728653
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Simmons v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 684 So. 2d 860
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 1996·No. No. 94-807·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from Appellant’s convictions and sentences for first-degree murder, kidnapping, and sexual battery. We have considered the issues raised relating to jury selection, Appellant’s motion for change of venue, Appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal, and Appellant’s sentences, and find no basis for reversal. Regarding James Burney’s competence to testify, even if this issue was properly preserved for appellate review, which it was not, we conclude that no error occurred, based on this court’s decision in Simmons v. State, 683 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., concur. BENTON, J., dissents with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons v. State, 687 So. 2d 1318, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13207, 1996 WL 728653 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

687 So. 2d 1318 (Simmons v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boggs v. State
667 So. 2d 765 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Reilly v. State
557 So. 2d 1365 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Simmons v. State
683 So. 2d 1101 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Singer v. State
109 So. 2d 7 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)
Lusk v. State
446 So. 2d 1038 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)