Simmons v. State

637 So. 2d 286, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3665, 1994 WL 142282
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 22, 1994
DocketNo. 90-3499
StatusPublished

This text of 637 So. 2d 286 (Simmons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simmons v. State, 637 So. 2d 286, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3665, 1994 WL 142282 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

[287]*287OPINION ON REMAND

PER CURIAM.

On remand from the supreme court for reconsideration of this case in light of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla.1993), we find 1) that there is no police conduct which would indicate a violation of due process, and 2) that there is evidence of predisposition of the appellant to commit the crimes of sale or delivery of cocaine and possession of cocaine; therefore, the issue of entrapment was properly submitted to the jury. See Lewis v. State, 634 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). We, therefore, affirm the judgment and sentence.

BOOTH, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Munoz v. State
629 So. 2d 90 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Lewis v. State
634 So. 2d 207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
637 So. 2d 286, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3665, 1994 WL 142282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.