Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Simmons v. State

Simmons v. State

637 So. 2d 286, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3665, 1994 WL 142282
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Simmons v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 611 So. 2d 1250 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 22, 1994·No. No. 90-3499·Published

Opinion

[287]*287OPINION ON REMAND

PER CURIAM.

On remand from the supreme court for reconsideration of this case in light of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla.1993), we find 1) that there is no police conduct which would indicate a violation of due process, and 2) that there is evidence of predisposition of the appellant to commit the crimes of sale or delivery of cocaine and possession of cocaine; therefore, the issue of entrapment was properly submitted to the jury. See Lewis v. State, 634 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). We, therefore, affirm the judgment and sentence.

BOOTH, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons v. State, 637 So. 2d 286, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3665, 1994 WL 142282 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

637 So. 2d 286 (Simmons v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Munoz v. State
629 So. 2d 90 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Lewis v. State
634 So. 2d 207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)