Simmons v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Simmons v. State

622 So. 2d 196, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8640, 1993 WL 314265

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 18, 1993

DocketNo. 93-02297

StatusPublished

This text of 622 So. 2d 196 (Simmons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simmons v. State, 622 So. 2d 196, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8640, 1993 WL 314265 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Randall Simmons appeals the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Flori[197]*197da Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Simmons claims that he received concurrent prison sentences in two separate cases and that he is entitled to the same amount of credit for presentence jail time in each case. See Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986).

Because we are unable to determine without any attachments from the files and records whether Keene v. State, 500 So.2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), might justify denial, we remand this case. On remand, the court should either grant Simmons equal credit or should support its ruling with attachments which substantiate the denial of the motion. Any party aggrieved by the subsequent action of the trial court must file a timely notice of appeal to obtain further appellate review.

Reversed and remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI