Home/Supreme Court/Simcox v. Madigan

Simcox v. Madigan

366 U.S. 765, 81 S. Ct. 1669, 6 L. Ed. 2d 854, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1027
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 5, 1961
Docket699, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 366 U.S. 765 (Simcox v. Madigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simcox v. Madigan, 366 U.S. 765, 81 S. Ct. 1669, 6 L. Ed. 2d 854, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1027 (1961).

Opinion

366 U.S. 765 (1961)

SIMCOX
v.
MADIGAN, WARDEN.

No. 699, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 5, 1961.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Doar, Harold H. Greene and David Rubin for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed and the case remanded for a hearing as suggested by the Solicitor General. Ellis v. United States, 356 U. S. 674.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Ragan v. Cox
369 U.S. 437 (Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
366 U.S. 765, 81 S. Ct. 1669, 6 L. Ed. 2d 854, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simcox-v-madigan-scotus-1961.