Siler-Khodr v. University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
This text of 292 F.3d 221 (Siler-Khodr v. University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Treating the petition for rehearing en bane as a petition for panel rehearing, the [222]*222petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
292 F.3d 221, 2002 WL 1000178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siler-khodr-v-university-of-texas-health-science-center-san-antonio-ca5-2002.