Shroyer v. Banks

Ohio Supreme Court

Shroyer v. Banks

2009 Ohio 4080, 914 N.E.2d 368, 123 Ohio St. 3d 88

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 19, 2009

Docket2009-0599

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 2009 Ohio 4080 (Shroyer v. Banks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shroyer v. Banks, 2009 Ohio 4080, 914 N.E.2d 368, 123 Ohio St. 3d 88 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, James R. Shroyer, for a writ of habeas corpus. Habeas corpus is not available to challenge the validity of a charging instrument. McCuller v. Hudson, 121 Ohio St.3d 168, 2009-Ohio-721, 902 N.E.2d 979, ¶1. In addition, Shroyer’s plea of guilty to the charges contained in the bill of information waived his claimed right to an indictment. State ex rel. Morris v. Leonard (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 624, 625, 716 N.E.2d 208. Finally, Shroyer’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is not cognizable in habeas corpus. Everett v. Eberlin, 114 Ohio St.3d 199, 2007-Ohio-3832, 870 N.E.2d 1190, ¶ 6.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, James R. Shroyer, for a writ of habeas corpus. Habeas corpus is not available to challenge the validity of a charging instrument. McCuller v. Hudson, 121 Ohio St.3d 168, 2009-Ohio-721, 902 N.E.2d 979, ¶1. In addition, Shroyer’s plea of guilty to the charges contained in the bill of information waived his claimed right to an indictment. State ex rel. Morris v. Leonard (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 624, 625, 716 N.E.2d 208. Finally, Shroyer’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is not cognizable in habeas corpus. Everett v. Eberlin, 114 Ohio St.3d 199, 2007-Ohio-3832, 870 N.E.2d 1190, ¶ 6.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2009 Ohio 4080, 914 N.E.2d 368, 123 Ohio St. 3d 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shroyer-v-banks-ohio-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack