Palmer v. Jeffreys
This text of 2011 Ohio 4058 (Palmer v. Jeffreys) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Atropin Palmer, for a writ of habeas corpus to compel his release from *388 prison. As the court of appeals correctly held, Palmer’s petition is “fatally defective” and subject to dismissal because he failed to attach a copy of his commitment papers. State ex rel. Jones v. Bradshaw, 123 Ohio St.3d 444, 2009-Ohio-5586, 917 N.E.2d 268, ¶ 1. Moreover, habeas corpus “is not available to challenge the validity of a charging instrument.” Shroyer v. Banks, 123 Ohio St.3d 88, 2009-Ohio-4080, 914 N.E.2d 368, ¶ 1. Palmer had adequate remedies in the ordinary course of law to raise his defective-indictment claim. Howard v. Randle, 95 Ohio St.3d 281, 2002-Ohio-2122, 767 N.E.2d 268, ¶ 6. We also deny Palmer’s motion to strike appellee’s brief.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 Ohio 4058, 952 N.E.2d 1147, 129 Ohio St. 3d 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-jeffreys-ohio-2011.