Shirley v. Standard Oil Co.

150 S.E. 215, 169 Ga. 300, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 343
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 17, 1929·No. No. 7197·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

An order passed by the judge as follows: “The above-stated ease having come on regularly to be heard on the 6th day of April, and now therefore it is ordered and adjudged by the court that the restraining order of the court granted on the 29th day of March, 1929, be and the same is hereby dissolved. The filing and approval of a bill of exceptions within fifteen days from this date shall operate as a supcrsedure in the case,” is not a judgment refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction, and affords no basis for a writ of error. Putnam Mills &c. Co. v. Stonecypher, 151 Ga. 14 (106 S. E. 87); Bradfield v. Abercrombie, 151 Ga. 401 (107 S. E. 45); Touchton v. Henderson, 158 Ga. 819 (124 S. E. 529) ; Kennedy v. Edenfield, 159 Ga. 816 (126 S. E. 779).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shirley v. Standard Oil Co., 150 S.E. 215, 169 Ga. 300, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 343 (Ga. 1929).

150 S.E. 215 (Shirley v. Standard Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Druggists Co-Operative Ice-Cream Inc. v. Cravey
188 S.E. 541 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Butters Manufacturing Co. v. Sims
174 S.E. 623 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Thurmond v. Hale
174 S.E. 241 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Wofford Oil Co. v. City of Nashville
170 S.E. 369 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Edwards v. Davis
161 S.E. 607 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Barrett v. American Securities Co.
159 S.E. 866 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Threlkeld v. Proctor
155 S.E. 522 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Williamson v. Allen
150 S.E. 907 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)
Forrester v. Denny
150 S.E. 555 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)