Shirley v. Standard Oil Co.
This text of 150 S.E. 215 (Shirley v. Standard Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An order passed by the judge as follows: “The above-stated ease having come on regularly to be heard on the 6th day of April, and now therefore it is ordered and adjudged by the court that the restraining order of the court granted on the 29th day of March, 1929, be and the same is hereby dissolved. The filing and approval of a bill of exceptions within fifteen days from this date shall operate as a supcrsedure in the case,” is not a judgment refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction, and affords no basis for a writ of error. Putnam Mills &c. Co. v. Stonecypher, 151 Ga. 14 (106 S. E. 87); Bradfield v. Abercrombie, 151 Ga. 401 (107 S. E. 45); Touchton v. Henderson, 158 Ga. 819 (124 S. E. 529) ; Kennedy v. Edenfield, 159 Ga. 816 (126 S. E. 779).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
150 S.E. 215, 169 Ga. 300, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shirley-v-standard-oil-co-ga-1929.