Forrester v. Denny
This text of 150 S.E. 555 (Forrester v. Denny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An order passed by the judge, as follows: “After hearing had upon the within petition, the restraining order heretofore passed in this cause is dissolved,” is not a judgment refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction, and affords no basis for a writ of error. Putnam Mills & Power Co. v. Stonecypher, 151 Ga. 14 (106 S. E. 87) ; Bradfield v. Abercrombie, 151 Ga. 401 (107 S. E. 45); Touchton v. Henderson, 158 Ga. 819 (124 S. E. 529) ; Kennedy v. Edenfield, 159 Ga. 816 (126 S. E. 779); Shirley v. Standard Oil Co., 169 Ga. 300.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
150 S.E. 555, 169 Ga. 435, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forrester-v-denny-ga-1929.