Forrester v. Denny

Supreme Court of Georgia

Forrester v. Denny

150 S.E. 555, 169 Ga. 435, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 379

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 15, 1929·No. No. 7296·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

An order passed by the judge, as follows: “After hearing had upon the within petition, the restraining order heretofore passed in this cause is dissolved,” is not a judgment refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction, and affords no basis for a writ of error. Putnam Mills & Power Co. v. Stonecypher, 151 Ga. 14 (106 S. E. 87) ; Bradfield v. Abercrombie, 151 Ga. 401 (107 S. E. 45); Touchton v. Henderson, 158 Ga. 819 (124 S. E. 529) ; Kennedy v. Edenfield, 159 Ga. 816 (126 S. E. 779); Shirley v. Standard Oil Co., 169 Ga. 300.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

An order passed by the judge, as follows: “After hearing had upon the within petition, the restraining order heretofore passed in this cause is dissolved,” is not a judgment refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction, and affords no basis for a writ of error. Putnam Mills & Power Co. v. Stonecypher, 151 Ga. 14 (106 S. E. 87) ; Bradfield v. Abercrombie, 151 Ga. 401 (107 S. E. 45); Touchton v. Henderson, 158 Ga. 819 (124 S. E. 529) ; Kennedy v. Edenfield, 159 Ga. 816 (126 S. E. 779); Shirley v. Standard Oil Co., 169 Ga. 300.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Forrester v. Denny, 150 S.E. 555, 169 Ga. 435, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 379 (Ga. 1929).

Pincite

150 S.E. 555 (Forrester v. Denny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related