Edwards v. Davis
This text of 161 S.E. 607 (Edwards v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The exception is to the following judgment: “The within and. foregoing case coming on for an interlocutory hearing, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged by the court that the temporary restraining order heretofore granted is dissolved.” There is no provision of law for reviewing by writ of error an interlocutory order merely dissolving, revoking, or setting aside a temporary restraining order. Hollinshead v. Lincolnton, 84 Ga. 590 (10 S. E. 1094); Stubbs v. McConnell, 119 Ga. 21 (45 S. E. 710) ; Ragan v. Ragan, 148 Ga. 151 (96 S. E. 96); Stonecypher v. Putnam Mills &c. Co., 151 Ga. 14 (106 S. E. 87) ; Williams v. Roberts, 169 Ga. 226 (150 S. E. 89) ; Shirley v. Standard Oil Co., 169 Ga. 300 (150 S. E. 215) ; Forrester v. Denny, 169 Ga. 435 (150 S. E. 555); Williamson v. Allen, 169 Ga. 537 (150 S. E. 907) ; Threlkeld v. Proctor, 171 Ga. 370 (155 S. E. 522).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 S.E. 607, 173 Ga. 813, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-davis-ga-1931.