Edwards v. Davis

161 S.E. 607, 173 Ga. 813, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 411
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 13, 1931·No. No. 8660·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The exception is to the following judgment: “The within and. foregoing case coming on for an interlocutory hearing, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged by the court that the temporary restraining order heretofore granted is dissolved.” There is no provision of law for reviewing by writ of error an interlocutory order merely dissolving, revoking, or setting aside a temporary restraining order. Hollinshead v. Lincolnton, 84 Ga. 590 (10 S. E. 1094); Stubbs v. McConnell, 119 Ga. 21 (45 S. E. 710) ; Ragan v. Ragan, 148 Ga. 151 (96 S. E. 96); Stonecypher v. Putnam Mills &c. Co., 151 Ga. 14 (106 S. E. 87) ; Williams v. Roberts, 169 Ga. 226 (150 S. E. 89) ; Shirley v. Standard Oil Co., 169 Ga. 300 (150 S. E. 215) ; Forrester v. Denny, 169 Ga. 435 (150 S. E. 555); Williamson v. Allen, 169 Ga. 537 (150 S. E. 907) ; Threlkeld v. Proctor, 171 Ga. 370 (155 S. E. 522).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. Davis, 161 S.E. 607, 173 Ga. 813, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 411 (Ga. 1931).

161 S.E. 607 (Edwards v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Troup County Rural Electrification Corp.
192 S.E. 15 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Walker v. Ful-Kalb Inc.
183 S.E. 776 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)