Shirley Brown and Dorothy Black v. Eckerd Drugs, Inc., a Corporation Now Merged With Jack Eckerd Corporation, Etc.

669 F.2d 913, 33 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 181, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15130, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 32,312, 28 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1579
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 16, 1981·No. 79-1821·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

ORDER

The appellants’ petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc has been submitted to the court. A poll of the court was requested, and in the poll an evenly divided court voted to deny rehearing en banc.

The panel considered the petition for rehearing and is of the opinion that it should be denied.

It is ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc are denied.

Entered at the direction of Judge Murna-ghan. Judge Russell, Judge Widener, Judge Hall, Judge Ervin and Judge Chapman would have granted rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shirley Brown and Dorothy Black v. Eckerd Drugs, Inc., a Corporation Now Merged With Jack Eckerd Corporation, Etc., 669 F.2d 913, 33 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 181, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15130, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 32,312, 28 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1579 (4th Cir. 1981).

669 F.2d 913 (Shirley Brown and Dorothy Black v. Eckerd Drugs, Inc., a Corporation Now Merged With Jack Eckerd Corporation, Etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related