Sherwood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sherwood v. State

111 So. 2d 96, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2837

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 3, 1959·No. No. 58-285·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

From a judgment of conviction for the offense prohibited by section 800.04, Fla. Stat., F.S.A., this appeal was taken.

The appellant urged five points upon which he relied for a reversal of the judgment. We have carefully considered each of these points and the entire record of the trial proceedings below, and we are not convinced that the errors, if any, were so prejudicial as to have resulted in- a miscarriage of justice. Section 54.23, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The evidence presented adequately supported the verdict.

[97]*97No harmful error having been made to appear, the judgment appealed from should be and it is hereby—

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., HORTON, J., and WARREN, LAMAR, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

From a judgment of conviction for the offense prohibited by section 800.04, Fla. Stat., F.S.A., this appeal was taken.

The appellant urged five points upon which he relied for a reversal of the judgment. We have carefully considered each of these points and the entire record of the trial proceedings below, and we are not convinced that the errors, if any, were so prejudicial as to have resulted in- a miscarriage of justice. Section 54.23, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The evidence presented adequately supported the verdict.

[97]*97No harmful error having been made to appear, the judgment appealed from should be and it is hereby—

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., HORTON, J., and WARREN, LAMAR, Associate Judge, concur.

Sherwood v. State, 111 So. 2d 96, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2837 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

111 So. 2d 96 (Sherwood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related