Mann v. Etchells

182 So. 198, 132 Fla. 409, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1760
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 14, 1938·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinions

Chapman, J.

This cause is here on writ of error to a final judgment entered in behalf of the defendant by the Circuit Court of Lake County, Florida. The instrument sued on was a promissory note representing the balance due on the purchase price of certain, property located in Lake County, Florida. The agreed purchase price of the *411 property was the sum of $4,500.00. The sum of $3,500.00 had been paid, leaving the amount of the note in the sum of $1,000.00 unpaid. The maker of the note entered into an agreement with the mortgagee to reconvey the property to him for and in consideration of the $1,000.00 unpaid on the property, thereby taking a loss in the approximate sum of $3,500.00. It seems that a deed was left at a bank at Eustis, where the mortgagee was to leave the purchase price mortgage and note sued upon herein and get the deed to the property. Some taxes had accumulated against the property and the mortgagee wanted these taxes paid by the maker of the note prior to acceptance of the deed and delivery of the note sued upon. This defense was interposed in the way of a plea to the action on the note. Under appropriate instructions by the Court on the issues tendered, a verdict was rendered and judgment entered for the defendant. We fail to find error in the record and the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown, J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mann v. Etchells, 182 So. 198, 132 Fla. 409, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1760 (Fla. 1938).

182 So. 198 (Mann v. Etchells) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rum Runner, Inc. v. Murawski
481 So. 2d 1301 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Cape Cave Corp. v. Skinner
42 Fla. Supp. 12 (Charlotte County Circuit Court, 1974)
Ortiz v. Ortiz
211 So. 2d 243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Stella A. Bello v. Union Trust Company
267 F.2d 190 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)
Bell v. Bell
112 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Batteiger v. Batteiger
109 So. 2d 602 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Sherwood v. State
111 So. 2d 96 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Hollywood, Inc. v. Clark
15 So. 2d 175 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)