Mann v. Etchells

Supreme Court of Florida

Mann v. Etchells

182 So. 198, 132 Fla. 409, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1760

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 14, 1938

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 182 So. 198 (Mann v. Etchells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mann v. Etchells, 182 So. 198, 132 Fla. 409, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1760 (Fla. 1938).

Pincite

Opinions

Chapman, J.

This cause is here on writ of error to a final judgment entered in behalf of the defendant by the Circuit Court of Lake County, Florida. The instrument sued on was a promissory note representing the balance due on the purchase price of certain, property located in Lake County, Florida. The agreed purchase price of the *411 property was the sum of $4,500.00. The sum of $3,500.00 had been paid, leaving the amount of the note in the sum of $1,000.00 unpaid. The maker of the note entered into an agreement with the mortgagee to reconvey the property to him for and in consideration of the $1,000.00 unpaid on the property, thereby taking a loss in the approximate sum of $3,500.00. It seems that a deed was left at a bank at Eustis, where the mortgagee was to leave the purchase price mortgage and note sued upon herein and get the deed to the property. Some taxes had accumulated against the property and the mortgagee wanted these taxes paid by the maker of the note prior to acceptance of the deed and delivery of the note sued upon. This defense was interposed in the way of a plea to the action on the note. Under appropriate instructions by the Court on the issues tendered, a verdict was rendered and judgment entered for the defendant. We fail to find error in the record and the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown, J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chapman, J.

This cause is here on writ of error to a final judgment entered in behalf of the defendant by the Circuit Court of Lake County, Florida. The instrument sued on was a promissory note representing the balance due on the purchase price of certain, property located in Lake County, Florida. The agreed purchase price of the *411 property was the sum of $4,500.00. The sum of $3,500.00 had been paid, leaving the amount of the note in the sum of $1,000.00 unpaid. The maker of the note entered into an agreement with the mortgagee to reconvey the property to him for and in consideration of the $1,000.00 unpaid on the property, thereby taking a loss in the approximate sum of $3,500.00. It seems that a deed was left at a bank at Eustis, where the mortgagee was to leave the purchase price mortgage and note sued upon herein and get the deed to the property. Some taxes had accumulated against the property and the mortgagee wanted these taxes paid by the maker of the note prior to acceptance of the deed and delivery of the note sued upon. This defense was interposed in the way of a plea to the action on the note. Under appropriate instructions by the Court on the issues tendered, a verdict was rendered and judgment entered for the defendant. We fail to find error in the record and the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown, J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 So. 198, 132 Fla. 409, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mann-v-etchells-fla-1938.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack