Sheffield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sheffield v. State

468 So. 2d 441, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1112, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13809

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 3, 1985

DocketNo. 84-2174

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 468 So. 2d 441 (Sheffield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sheffield v. State, 468 So. 2d 441, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1112, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13809 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs and record on appeal we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore, the revocation of appellant’s probation is affirmed. However, since there appears to be some misapprehension on the subject, we wish to point out that appellant’s sentences which were imposed on September 20, 1984, were not under the sentencing guidelines because his crimes were committed prior to October 1, 1983, and he did not affirmatively select to be sentenced under the guidelines. See Heathcoat v. State, 463 So.2d 449 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Rodriguez v. State, 458 So.2d 899 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHEB and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs and record on appeal we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore, the revocation of appellant’s probation is affirmed. However, since there appears to be some misapprehension on the subject, we wish to point out that appellant’s sentences which were imposed on September 20, 1984, were not under the sentencing guidelines because his crimes were committed prior to October 1, 1983, and he did not affirmatively select to be sentenced under the guidelines. See Heathcoat v. State, 463 So.2d 449 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Rodriguez v. State, 458 So.2d 899 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHEB and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

468 So. 2d 441, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1112, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheffield-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack