Heathcoat v. State
This text of 463 So. 2d 449 (Heathcoat v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John HEATHCOAT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John T. Kilcrease, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Davis G. Anderson, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The judgments and sentences entered in this case are affirmed. Because there appears to be some misapprehension on the subject, we wish to point out that appellant's sentences which were imposed on January 3, 1984, were not under the sentencing guidelines because his crimes were committed prior to October 1, 1983, and he did not "affirmatively select" to be sentenced under the guidelines.
GRIMES, A.C.J., and DANAHY and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
463 So. 2d 449, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heathcoat-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.