Home/Supreme Court/Shapiro v. Doe

Shapiro v. Doe

396 U.S. 488, 90 S. Ct. 641, 24 L. Ed. 2d 677, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 3136
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 2, 1970
Docket805
StatusPublished
Cited by58 cases

This text of 396 U.S. 488 (Shapiro v. Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shapiro v. Doe, 396 U.S. 488, 90 S. Ct. 641, 24 L. Ed. 2d 677, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 3136 (1970).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The motion of the appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is also granted and the appeal is dismissed for failure to docket the case within the time prescribed by Rule 13.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Humphreys v. State
1997 OK CR 59 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1997)
Dombroff v. Greene (In Re Dombroff)
192 B.R. 615 (S.D. New York, 1996)
Doe v. United Services Life Insurance
123 F.R.D. 437 (S.D. New York, 1988)
Ruiz v. Blum
549 F. Supp. 871 (S.D. New York, 1982)
Simpson v. Miller
535 F. Supp. 1041 (N.D. Illinois, 1982)
Doe v. Stegall
653 F.2d 180 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
Doe v. Rostker
89 F.R.D. 158 (N.D. California, 1981)
Perillo v. Commonwealth
383 A.2d 208 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
Longey v. Philbrook
438 F. Supp. 264 (D. Vermont, 1977)
Rush v. Smith
437 F. Supp. 576 (S.D. New York, 1977)
Buckner v. Maher
424 F. Supp. 366 (D. Connecticut, 1976)
Shook v. Lavine
49 A.D.2d 238 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Frances K. Grow v. Sidney E. Smith, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services
511 F.2d 1146 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
Jennings v. Lavine
79 Misc. 2d 176 (New York Supreme Court, 1974)
Taylor v. Lavine
497 F.2d 1208 (Second Circuit, 1974)
Annie Taylor, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor, Dependent Child, Margaret Taylor v. Abe Lavine, Individually and in His Capacity as Commissioner of the New Yorkstate Department of Social Services, and James M. Shuart, Individually, and Inhis Capacity as Commissioner of the Nassau County Department of Socialservices,appellants. Rose Hurley, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Children, Doreen Hurley,et Al. v. Barry Van Lare, Individually and in His Capacity as Acting Commissioner of Thestate of New York
497 F.2d 1208 (Second Circuit, 1974)
Lynch v. Sperry Rand Corp.
62 F.R.D. 78 (S.D. New York, 1973)
Shirley v. Lavine
365 F. Supp. 818 (N.D. New York, 1973)
Doe v. Norton
365 F. Supp. 65 (D. Connecticut, 1973)
Doe v. Gillman
479 F.2d 646 (Eighth Circuit, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
396 U.S. 488, 90 S. Ct. 641, 24 L. Ed. 2d 677, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 3136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shapiro-v-doe-scotus-1970.