Shang v. Holley
435 U.S. 947, 98 S. Ct. 1532
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 27, 1978
DocketNo. 77-318
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases
This text of 435 U.S. 947 (Shang v. Holley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shang v. Holley, 435 U.S. 947, 98 S. Ct. 1532 (1978).
Opinion
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of respondents Holley et al. for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Szewczyk v. Department of Social Services
822 A.2d 957 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2003)
MATTER OF ALIESSA v. Novello
754 N.E.2d 1085 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
Castillo v. Jackson
566 N.E.2d 404 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1990)
Brambila v. Board of Review
574 A.2d 992 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)
Alvarado v. Board of Review
737 P.2d 180 (Utah Supreme Court, 1987)
Vazquez v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division
487 N.E.2d 171 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1985)
Division of Employment & Training v. Industrial Commission
705 P.2d 1022 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1985)
Berger v. Heckler
771 F.2d 1556 (Second Circuit, 1985)
Arteaga v. Industrial Com'n of State
703 P.2d 654 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1985)
Cruz v. Commissioner of Public Welfare
478 N.E.2d 1262 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1985)
Antillon v. Department of Employment Security
688 P.2d 455 (Utah Supreme Court, 1984)
Rubio v. Employment Division
674 P.2d 1201 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)
Papadopoulos v. Shang
67 A.D.2d 84 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
435 U.S. 947, 98 S. Ct. 1532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shang-v-holley-scotus-1978.