Shah v. United States

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedMarch 14, 2022
Docket1:22-cv-02049
StatusUnknown

This text of Shah v. United States (Shah v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shah v. United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK B.K. SHAH, Plaintiff, 22-CV-2049 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Defendant. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On August 19, 2014, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Shah v. N.Y. State Office of Mental Health, ECF 7:14- CV-3304, 7 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 14, 2014). Plaintiff files this new pro se case and has not sought leave from the Court. The Court therefore dismisses the action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the August 19, 2014 order. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: March 14, 2022 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Shah v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shah-v-united-states-nysd-2022.